View source for Disciplinary Procedures and Infractions

{{MetaDescription|Learn about Disciplinary Procedures and Infractions's federal case, conviction, and prison experience on Prisonpedia.}}
'''Disciplinary Procedures and Infractions''' in the [[Index_of_Federal_Prison_Facilities|Federal Bureau of Prisons]] (BOP) are governed by federal regulations in 28 C.F.R. part 541 and the BOP’s Inmate Discipline Program. The system defines prohibited acts, outlines investigative and hearing procedures, and authorizes sanctions ranging from reprimands to loss of good conduct time and disciplinary segregation.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. Part 541 — Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541 |publisher=Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> Disciplinary findings can affect liberty interests such as good conduct time, custody level, program eligibility, and conditions of confinement, and therefore must follow due process standards established by ''Wolff v. McDonnell'' and the “some evidence” requirement of ''Superintendent v. Hill''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wolff v. McDonnell |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-679 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 26, 1974 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/84-438 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 17, 1985 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

The disciplinary process begins when staff issue an incident report describing alleged misconduct. Cases are reviewed by a Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) and, for more serious charges, by a Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO). Individuals have specified procedural rights at each step, including notice, an opportunity to present evidence, a staff representative upon request, and a written statement of the decision and evidence relied upon.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. Part 541 Subpart A — Inmate Discipline Program |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==How it works==
The disciplinary system addresses misconduct through a standardized sequence: reporting, investigation, classification by severity, hearing, decision, and sanction. An incident report initiates the process and includes the date, time, place, and description of the alleged act; it is ordinarily delivered after the event and initial investigation.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.5 — Incident report |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.5 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> After review by the UDC, cases classified as High or Greatest severity are referred to the DHO for a formal hearing, while Moderate or Low cases may be resolved at the UDC level.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.7 — Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.7 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.8 — Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO) |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.8 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

===Process overview===
* '''Incident report and investigation''' — Staff investigate and issue an incident report when they reasonably believe a prohibited act occurred; a lieutenant ordinarily conducts the investigation and advises the inmate of rights related to the disciplinary process.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.5 — Incident report |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.5 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>
* '''UDC review''' — The UDC reviews the report, hears from the inmate, determines responsibility, and imposes sanctions when authorized, or refers the matter to the DHO if severity or complexity requires.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.7 — Unit Discipline Committee (UDC) |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.7 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>
* '''DHO hearing''' — For referred cases, a DHO conducts a hearing with procedural safeguards, considers evidence, resolves factual disputes, and issues a written decision with reasons and sanctions.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.8 — Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO) |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.8 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Prohibited acts and severity==
BOP classifies misconduct into four severity levels: '''Greatest''' (100-series), '''High''' (200-series), '''Moderate''' (300-series), and '''Low''' (400-series). Each level includes specific codes and descriptions (e.g., 101–killing, 104–assault, 113–possession of drugs; 205–fighting; 305–possession of unauthorized item; 405–failure to follow safety regulations), with corresponding sanction ranges scaled to the seriousness of the conduct.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.3 — Table 1: Prohibited acts and disciplinary severity scale |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.3 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Rights and due process==
Under ''Wolff v. McDonnell'', when sanctions may affect liberty interests such as good conduct time, minimum due process includes: advance written notice of charges, a meaningful opportunity to present evidence and call witnesses when not hazardous to institutional safety, assistance by a staff representative upon request, and a written statement of the evidence and reasons for the decision.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wolff v. McDonnell |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-679 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 26, 1974 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> The finding must be supported by '''some evidence''' in the record, per ''Superintendent v. Hill''; federal courts do not reweigh credibility but review whether any evidence reasonably supports the decision.<ref>{{cite web |title=Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/84-438 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 17, 1985 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> Due process protections are applied within the framework of reasonable prison regulation; additional liberty interests may arise only where sanctions impose an atypical and significant hardship in relation to ordinary prison life, per ''Sandin v. Conner''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sandin v. Conner |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/93-1911 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 19, 1995 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Sanctions==
Authorized sanctions include, among others: loss of privileges (commissary, visiting, telephone), impounding personal property, monetary restitution, extra duty, disciplinary segregation, and '''disallowance or forfeiture of good conduct time''' for certain severity levels. Sanctions must be proportionate to the offense category and may be combined as permitted by regulation and program statement tables.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.3 — Sanctions by severity level |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.3 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> Placement in Special Housing Units (SHU) and disciplinary segregation follow additional procedural and review requirements to ensure humane conditions and continued access to basic services.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.21 — Special Housing Units |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-B/section-541.21 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.26 — Review of placement in the SHU |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-B/section-541.26 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Evidence, representation, and hearings==
At the DHO hearing, individuals may request a '''staff representative''' to assist with evidence gathering and presentation; they may call witnesses and present documents subject to safety and relevance limits. The DHO may consider documentary, testimonial, and physical evidence, including surveillance or laboratory reports, and must document the reasons for excluding evidence or witnesses when necessary for security or institutional order.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.8 — Discipline Hearing Officer procedures |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.8 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Appeals and administrative remedies==
Findings and sanctions may be appealed through the BOP’s '''Administrative Remedy Program''', beginning with a BP‑10 to the Regional Director and a BP‑11 to the General Counsel after any institutional-level review required by policy. The Administrative Remedy Program is governed by 28 C.F.R. part 542 and BOP Program Statement 1330.18, which set filing deadlines, format, and routing for appeals of disciplinary decisions.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. Part 542 — Administrative Remedy |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-542 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Administrative Remedy Program, Program Statement 1330.18 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/1330_018.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=January 6, 2014 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref> Judicial review of good-time disallowance may be sought via habeas corpus where appropriate, with courts applying the ''Hill'' “some evidence” standard and ''Wolff'' procedural benchmarks.<ref>{{cite web |title=Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/84-438 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 17, 1985 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Wolff v. McDonnell |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-679 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 26, 1974 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Interaction with classification, programs, and good conduct time==
Disciplinary findings can affect '''custody classification''', '''program eligibility''', and '''good conduct time''' awards. Certain sanctions may result in disallowance or forfeiture of good conduct time under BOP policy and regulations, which in turn affects projected release dates calculated under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). Program participation (e.g., work assignments, education, and some rehabilitative offerings) may be limited during disciplinary segregation or following certain High or Greatest severity findings, consistent with institutional safety requirements.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. § 541.3 — Sanctions affecting good conduct time |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.3 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Criticisms and challenges==
Observers have raised concerns about the breadth of prohibited acts, proportionality of sanctions, and the impact of disciplinary segregation on mental health; courts evaluate these concerns through due process analysis and Eighth Amendment standards, with relief available where sanctions impose atypical and significant hardships or where procedures deviate from ''Wolff'' and ''Hill''. Policy reforms and litigation often focus on notice adequacy, access to witnesses, and written justification standards to ensure transparency and fairness.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sandin v. Conner |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/93-1911 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 19, 1995 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Wolff v. McDonnell |url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-679 |publisher=Oyez |date=June 26, 1974 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==Background and authority==
The BOP’s disciplinary authority derives from statute and regulation and is implemented via Program Statements that provide operational detail to staff and incarcerated persons. 28 C.F.R. part 541 codifies the disciplinary severity scale, procedures for UDC and DHO hearings, and available sanctions; BOP Program Statement 5270.09 operationalizes these requirements across institutions, with related policies addressing special housing, evidence handling, and appeals.<ref>{{cite web |title=28 C.F.R. Part 541 — Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units |url=https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541 |publisher=eCFR |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Inmate Discipline Program, Program Statement 5270.09 |url=https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf |publisher=Federal Bureau of Prisons |date=August 1, 2011 |access-date=December 1, 2025}}</ref>

==See also==
* [[Index_of_Federal_Prison_Facilities|Federal Bureau of Prisons]]
* [[Inmate_Discipline_Program|Inmate Discipline Program]]
* [[Administrative_Remedy_Process_(BP-8_to_BP-11)|Administrative Remedy Program]]
* [[First_Step_Act:_Overview_and_Implementation|First Step Act]]
* [[Overview_of_Incarcerated_Persons'_Rights|Overview of Incarcerated Persons’ Rights]]

==External links==
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541 28 C.F.R. Part 541 — Inmate Discipline and Special Housing Units]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.3 28 C.F.R. § 541.3 — Prohibited acts and severity scale]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.5 28 C.F.R. § 541.5 — Incident report]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.7 28 C.F.R. § 541.7 — Unit Discipline Committee]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-A/section-541.8 28 C.F.R. § 541.8 — Discipline Hearing Officer]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-B/section-541.21 28 C.F.R. § 541.21 — Special Housing Units]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-541/subpart-B/section-541.26 28 C.F.R. § 541.26 — Review of placement in the SHU]
* [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-542 28 C.F.R. Part 542 — Administrative Remedy]
* [https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270_009.pdf BOP Program Statement 5270.09 — Inmate Discipline Program (PDF)]
* [https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/1330_018.pdf BOP Program Statement 1330.18 — Administrative Remedy Program (PDF)]
* [https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-679 Wolff v. McDonnell — Oyez]
* [https://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/84-438 Superintendent v. Hill — Oyez]
* [https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/93-1911 Sandin v. Conner — Oyez]

==References==
<references />
{{#seo:
|title_mode=append
|title_separator= - Prisonpedia
|description=Guide to federal prison disciplinary procedures. Learn about incident reports, DHO hearings, sanctions, and SHU placement.
|keywords=incident report, DHO, SHU, prison discipline, infractions, sanctions
|type=article
|site_name=Prisonpedia
|locale=en_US
}}

<html>
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "name": "Disciplinary Procedures and Infractions",
  "description": "Comprehensive guide to Disciplinary Procedures and Infractions in the federal prison system.",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization", 
    "name": "Prisonpedia"
  }
}
</script>
</html>